American journal of clinical pathology · 2025
Myeloid sarcomas with CBFA2T3 : GLIS2 fusion: clinicopathologic characterization of 4 cases mimicking small round cell tumors.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Malik Faizan, Eldomery Mohammad K, Wang Wei, Gheorghe Gabriela, Khanlari Mahsa
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Acute myeloid leukemia with CBFA2T3::GLIS2 fusion can initially present as extramedullary lesions (myeloid sarcoma), leading to a misdiagnosis of nonhematologic pediatric solid tumors.
METHODS: We characterized the clinicopathologic features of 4 cases of CBFA2T3::GLIS2 fusion-positive myeloid sarcoma in pediatric patients where the sarcoma presented either without leukemic involvement (isolated myeloid sarcoma; 3/4 [75%]) or had concurrent leukemic disease (1/4 [25%]).
RESULTS: All cases mimicked nonhematopoietic tumors at morphologic and immunophenotypic levels, so the initial evaluation did not raise suspicion for acute myeloid leukemia/myeloid sarcoma. After extensive workup, however, including molecular studies, the diagnosis of myeloid sarcoma with CBFA2T3::GLIS2 fusion was rendered.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for a high suspicion index of GLIS2-rearranged myeloid sarcoma in the differential diagnosis of pediatric small round cell tumors in tissue biopsies and the application of adequate workup to avoid misdiagnosing this entity.
METHODS: We characterized the clinicopathologic features of 4 cases of CBFA2T3::GLIS2 fusion-positive myeloid sarcoma in pediatric patients where the sarcoma presented either without leukemic involvement (isolated myeloid sarcoma; 3/4 [75%]) or had concurrent leukemic disease (1/4 [25%]).
RESULTS: All cases mimicked nonhematopoietic tumors at morphologic and immunophenotypic levels, so the initial evaluation did not raise suspicion for acute myeloid leukemia/myeloid sarcoma. After extensive workup, however, including molecular studies, the diagnosis of myeloid sarcoma with CBFA2T3::GLIS2 fusion was rendered.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for a high suspicion index of GLIS2-rearranged myeloid sarcoma in the differential diagnosis of pediatric small round cell tumors in tissue biopsies and the application of adequate workup to avoid misdiagnosing this entity.