Folia medica Cracoviensia · 2023
Differences in the cardiovascular hemodynamic response between the Valsalva and Reverse Valsalva Maneuvers in healthy subjects.
Clinical StudyСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boryczko Andrzej, Furgała Agata, Jurczyk Michał, Augustyn Karolina, Gil Krzysztof
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Valsalva Maneuver (VM) is the first-line treatment for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, but a recent, novel, and efficient tool to restore sinus rhythm has been described, i.e., the Reverse Valsalva (RV). This study aims to compare changes in cardiovascular hemodynamics and autonomic system activity (ANS) based on heart rate variability (HRV) analysis during both maneuvers.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants performed the VM and RV maneuvers three times in a sitting position for durations of 15 s and 10 s, respectively. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were continuously monitored before, during and after the tests. Autonomic system activity was evaluated using frequency-domain analysis of HRV.
RESULTS: The decrease in HR from baseline to the lowest values, expressed as a ratio, was similar during both maneuvers (0.81 during the RV vs. 0.79 during the VM, p = 0.27). However, the final lowest HR in response to the RV was higher than that in response to the VM, 70/min vs. 59/min (p <0.001). The activation of the autonomic nervous system during the most bradycardic phase of the RV (phase II) and VM (phase IV) showed that the total power of HRV was less prominent during the RV than during the VM (p <0.012), with similar levels of parasympathetic activation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed less HR slowdown during the RV than during the VM. The changes in HRV parameters during both procedures in particular phases of the RV and VM suggest that the autonomic nervous system is activated alternately, so these tests can be used complementarily in a clinical setting with different results.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy participants performed the VM and RV maneuvers three times in a sitting position for durations of 15 s and 10 s, respectively. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were continuously monitored before, during and after the tests. Autonomic system activity was evaluated using frequency-domain analysis of HRV.
RESULTS: The decrease in HR from baseline to the lowest values, expressed as a ratio, was similar during both maneuvers (0.81 during the RV vs. 0.79 during the VM, p = 0.27). However, the final lowest HR in response to the RV was higher than that in response to the VM, 70/min vs. 59/min (p <0.001). The activation of the autonomic nervous system during the most bradycardic phase of the RV (phase II) and VM (phase IV) showed that the total power of HRV was less prominent during the RV than during the VM (p <0.012), with similar levels of parasympathetic activation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed less HR slowdown during the RV than during the VM. The changes in HRV parameters during both procedures in particular phases of the RV and VM suggest that the autonomic nervous system is activated alternately, so these tests can be used complementarily in a clinical setting with different results.