Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2001
Use of a saline-irrigated tip catheter for ablation of ventricular tachycardia resistant to conventional radiofrequency ablation: early experience.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nabar A, Rodriguez L M, Timmermans C, Wellens H J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) may fail if the critical isthmus is located intramyocardially or epicardially. The design of a saline-irrigated tip (SIT) catheter (Thermo-Cool, Cordis-Webster) involves active cooling of the tip electrode, which allows creation of larger ablation lesions.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients (6 men, age 59 +/- 12 years) in whom the clinical target VT (cycle length 430 +/- 97 msec) could not be ablated using a conventional 4-mm tip RF ablation catheter underwent additional attempts to ablate this VT using a SIT catheter. Six patients had an old myocardial infarction, 1 patient had a dilated cardiomyopathy, and 1 patient had a structurally normal heart. Ablation of the clinical target VT using a SIT catheter was attempted from the left ventricle in 6 (septal, posterobasal, and inferior: 2 each) and from the right ventricle in 2 patients (both septal), by entrainment (n = 6), activation (n = 1), or pace mapping (n = 1). A mean of 6 +/- 5 (range 2 to 15) pulses were delivered. Target VT ablation was successful in 5 patients (63%). After successful ablation, at a mean follow-up of 6.5 +/- 4 months and while taking antiarrhythmic drugs, all 5 patients were free of VT recurrences.
CONCLUSION: The clinical target VT could be ablated using a SIT catheter in 5 (63%) of the 8 patients in whom ablation using a conventional RF catheter was unsuccessful. In the 2 patients with septal VT, a biventricular approach to mapping and ablation was required.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients (6 men, age 59 +/- 12 years) in whom the clinical target VT (cycle length 430 +/- 97 msec) could not be ablated using a conventional 4-mm tip RF ablation catheter underwent additional attempts to ablate this VT using a SIT catheter. Six patients had an old myocardial infarction, 1 patient had a dilated cardiomyopathy, and 1 patient had a structurally normal heart. Ablation of the clinical target VT using a SIT catheter was attempted from the left ventricle in 6 (septal, posterobasal, and inferior: 2 each) and from the right ventricle in 2 patients (both septal), by entrainment (n = 6), activation (n = 1), or pace mapping (n = 1). A mean of 6 +/- 5 (range 2 to 15) pulses were delivered. Target VT ablation was successful in 5 patients (63%). After successful ablation, at a mean follow-up of 6.5 +/- 4 months and while taking antiarrhythmic drugs, all 5 patients were free of VT recurrences.
CONCLUSION: The clinical target VT could be ablated using a SIT catheter in 5 (63%) of the 8 patients in whom ablation using a conventional RF catheter was unsuccessful. In the 2 patients with septal VT, a biventricular approach to mapping and ablation was required.