Disability and rehabilitation · 2025
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the stroke upper limb capacity scale.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xia Minqi, Ye Jingjing, Dong Yewen, Yang Lingdi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) compared to the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with hemiplegia after stroke (n = 60). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to explore the reliability, and Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze validity. Floor and ceiling effects were counted.
RESULTS: The ICCs for inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability were ICC = 0.985 (95%CI = 0.966-0.992) and ICC = 0.982 (95%CI = 0.970-0.989), respectively. The SULCS demonstrated a strong correlation with the WMFT (r = 0.922, p < 0.001) and FMA-UE (r = 0.921, p < 0.001) at baseline. The WMFT and FMA at week 3 were as strong as those at baseline (r = 0.946, p < 0.001 and r = 0.952, p < 0.001, respectively). There was a strong longitudinal correlation between the changes in SULCS and WMFT and FMA-UE from baseline to week 3 (r = 0.745, p < 0.001 and r = 0.768, p < 0.001, respectively). No floor and ceiling effects were detected in any assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of the psychometric properties supports the use of the Chinese version of the SULCS to measure upper limb capacity in patients with hemiplegia after stroke.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with hemiplegia after stroke (n = 60). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to explore the reliability, and Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze validity. Floor and ceiling effects were counted.
RESULTS: The ICCs for inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability were ICC = 0.985 (95%CI = 0.966-0.992) and ICC = 0.982 (95%CI = 0.970-0.989), respectively. The SULCS demonstrated a strong correlation with the WMFT (r = 0.922, p < 0.001) and FMA-UE (r = 0.921, p < 0.001) at baseline. The WMFT and FMA at week 3 were as strong as those at baseline (r = 0.946, p < 0.001 and r = 0.952, p < 0.001, respectively). There was a strong longitudinal correlation between the changes in SULCS and WMFT and FMA-UE from baseline to week 3 (r = 0.745, p < 0.001 and r = 0.768, p < 0.001, respectively). No floor and ceiling effects were detected in any assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of the psychometric properties supports the use of the Chinese version of the SULCS to measure upper limb capacity in patients with hemiplegia after stroke.