Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy · 2022
Percutaneous recanalization in hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome: hepatic or accessory hepatic vein.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xia Feng-Fei, Ni Cai-Fang, Zu Mao-Heng
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the clinical efficiency and long-term outcomes of hepatic vein (HV) and accessory hepatic vein (AHV) recanalization in patients with HV-type Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 27 patients with HV-type BCS underwent AHV recanalization and 94 patients had HV recanalization at our center from January 2012 to December 2019. The treatment effectiveness and long-term outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Technical success was accomplished in all patients, without any procedure-related complications. The clinical success rates were 96.3% (26/27) and 95.7% (90/94) (p = 1.000). In the AHV and HV groups, re-obstruction was observed in 5 and 36 patients, respectively (p = 0.056). The median primary durations of AHV and HV patency were 64 and 49 months, respectively (p = 0.036), while the median secondary durations of AHV and HV patency were 70 and 64 months, respectively (p = 0.134). The median overall survival after AHV and HV recanalization was 73 and 78 months, respectively (p = 0.263).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that AHV could be employed as a replacement for HV, as a hepatic drainage vein, in HV-type BCS patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 27 patients with HV-type BCS underwent AHV recanalization and 94 patients had HV recanalization at our center from January 2012 to December 2019. The treatment effectiveness and long-term outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Technical success was accomplished in all patients, without any procedure-related complications. The clinical success rates were 96.3% (26/27) and 95.7% (90/94) (p = 1.000). In the AHV and HV groups, re-obstruction was observed in 5 and 36 patients, respectively (p = 0.056). The median primary durations of AHV and HV patency were 64 and 49 months, respectively (p = 0.036), while the median secondary durations of AHV and HV patency were 70 and 64 months, respectively (p = 0.134). The median overall survival after AHV and HV recanalization was 73 and 78 months, respectively (p = 0.263).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that AHV could be employed as a replacement for HV, as a hepatic drainage vein, in HV-type BCS patients.