Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
Effect of intra-abdominal administration of ascites fluid on postoperative peritoneal adhesion in rat model: A randomized controlled trail.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
ShaykhoIslami Ali, Ghasemian Mohammadreza, Zardast Mahmoud, Farzad Marjan
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Intra-abdominal adhesions are typically found after the most surgical procedures. Normally, most adhesions are asymptomatic; however, few individuals experience postoperative adhesion-related problems such as small bowel obstruction, pelvic pain, infertility, or other complications. We aimed to evaluate the preventive effect of the ascites fluid for postoperative peritoneal adhesions in rat models.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This experimental trial was conducted in Sixty Syrian male rat randomly assigned to six groups of 10 animals each as follows: control (group 1&4); normal saline (group 2&5): 2 mL of normal saline was poured into the peritoneal cavity; and case (group 3&6): 2 mL ascites fluid was poured into the peritoneal cavity. All animals in the six groups underwent laparotomy and measurable serosal injury were created with a standard technique. 10 and 30 days after initial surgery, the rats underwent another laparotomy in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, 5, 6, respectively to assess macroscopic and microscopic adhesions, which were scored by an examiner who was blind to the animals̕ group assignment. Data analyzed by SPSS version 18, using the kruskal Wallis and Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U tests. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS: The mean scores of both microscopic and macroscopic adhesion were significantly different between all the groups (P < 0.05). Total macroscopic and microscopic adhesion scores were significantly lower in the ascites fluid treatment than in the control (P = 0.0001) or the normal saline (P < 0.001) group. There was no significant difference between adhesion intensity 10 and 30 days after laparotomy (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Ascites fluid can decrease the possibility of post-operative intraperitoneal adhesion formation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This experimental trial was conducted in Sixty Syrian male rat randomly assigned to six groups of 10 animals each as follows: control (group 1&4); normal saline (group 2&5): 2 mL of normal saline was poured into the peritoneal cavity; and case (group 3&6): 2 mL ascites fluid was poured into the peritoneal cavity. All animals in the six groups underwent laparotomy and measurable serosal injury were created with a standard technique. 10 and 30 days after initial surgery, the rats underwent another laparotomy in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, 5, 6, respectively to assess macroscopic and microscopic adhesions, which were scored by an examiner who was blind to the animals̕ group assignment. Data analyzed by SPSS version 18, using the kruskal Wallis and Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U tests. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS: The mean scores of both microscopic and macroscopic adhesion were significantly different between all the groups (P < 0.05). Total macroscopic and microscopic adhesion scores were significantly lower in the ascites fluid treatment than in the control (P = 0.0001) or the normal saline (P < 0.001) group. There was no significant difference between adhesion intensity 10 and 30 days after laparotomy (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Ascites fluid can decrease the possibility of post-operative intraperitoneal adhesion formation.