Annali italiani di chirurgia · 2009
Comparison of topical glyceryl trinitrate with diltiazem ointment for treatment of chronic anal fissure. A randomized clinical trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sanei Behnam, Mahmoodieh Mohsen, Masoudpour Hassan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of topical glycerol trinitrate ointment (GTN) with topical diltiazem hydrochloride ointment (DTZ) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.
METHOD: Prospectively, 102 patients were treated randomly with either GTN ointment (0.2%) or DTZ ointment (2%) couple of times daily for 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients (88.2%) in group DTZ and 36 patients (70.6%) in group GTZ had reduction of symptoms. The decrease in the symptoms for group DTZ were significantly more than that for group GTN (P = 0.02). Mean time of symptom reduction was 2.44 +/- 0.30 in group DTZ and 2.50 +/- 0.28 weeks in group GTN without significant differences between two groups (P > 0.05). Complete relieving of symptoms was observed in 72.5%, 54.9% patients in groups DTZ and GTN, respectively. The frequency of complete relieving of symptoms between two groups was not significant (P > 0.05). Complete remission of anal fissure was occurred in 66.7% patients in group DTZ and 54.9% patients in group GTN, which was no different, significantly. Mean time taken for fissure healing in GTN group was dramatically less than DTZ group (P = 0.001). Finally, 33.3% of patients in DTZ group and 45.1% of patients in GTN group was operated. The need for operation was not significant between two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Both DTZ and GTN are equally effective and can be the preferred first-line treatment of chronic anal fissure a. However, GTN is associated with a higher rate of headache, and it should be replaced by DTZ.
METHOD: Prospectively, 102 patients were treated randomly with either GTN ointment (0.2%) or DTZ ointment (2%) couple of times daily for 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients (88.2%) in group DTZ and 36 patients (70.6%) in group GTZ had reduction of symptoms. The decrease in the symptoms for group DTZ were significantly more than that for group GTN (P = 0.02). Mean time of symptom reduction was 2.44 +/- 0.30 in group DTZ and 2.50 +/- 0.28 weeks in group GTN without significant differences between two groups (P > 0.05). Complete relieving of symptoms was observed in 72.5%, 54.9% patients in groups DTZ and GTN, respectively. The frequency of complete relieving of symptoms between two groups was not significant (P > 0.05). Complete remission of anal fissure was occurred in 66.7% patients in group DTZ and 54.9% patients in group GTN, which was no different, significantly. Mean time taken for fissure healing in GTN group was dramatically less than DTZ group (P = 0.001). Finally, 33.3% of patients in DTZ group and 45.1% of patients in GTN group was operated. The need for operation was not significant between two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Both DTZ and GTN are equally effective and can be the preferred first-line treatment of chronic anal fissure a. However, GTN is associated with a higher rate of headache, and it should be replaced by DTZ.