Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
Remote Monitoring in Myasthenia Gravis: Exploring Symptom Variability.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stein Maike, Mönch Maximilian, Herdick Meret, Stascheit Frauke, Hoffmann Sarah, Preßler Hannah, Mergenthaler Philipp, Dusemund Carla, Doksani Paolo, Sun Haoqi, Narayanaswami Pushpa, Meisel Andreas, Gerischer Lea, Lehnerer Sophie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, autoimmune disorder characterized by fluctuating muscle weakness and potential life-threatening crises. While continuous specialized care is essential, access barriers often delay timely interventions. To address this, we developed MyaLink, a telemedical platform for MG patients. This study evaluated whether frequently assessed clinical outcomes via MyaLink can capture symptom variability between clinical visits.
METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, 12-week study, 45 MG patients received either standard care (control, N = 15) or standard care with additional telemedical treatment (intervention, N = 30) including assessment of patient-reported outcome measures, sensor-based data, and patient-physician messaging via a mobile application. Physicians performed telemedical check-ups (TCUs) via a web-based platform, adjusting treatment as needed.
RESULTS: In the intervention group, variability in clinical scores and sensor-derived data was observed, particularly among those who experienced MG-related hospitalizations or exacerbations (H&E subgroup). This subgroup showed larger MG-ADL score fluctuations (mean range: 5.8 vs. 2.6 points), sent more messages, had more steroid dose adjustments (40% vs. 0%), and more frequent TCU interventions (93.3% vs. 60%) than the Non-H&E subgroup.
INTERPRETATION: Telemedical platforms in MG might detect early signs of worsening. High-risk patients (H&E subgroup) require increased medical support, which can be effectively addressed through MyaLink.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered under the German clinical trial registry (DRKS00029907).
METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, 12-week study, 45 MG patients received either standard care (control, N = 15) or standard care with additional telemedical treatment (intervention, N = 30) including assessment of patient-reported outcome measures, sensor-based data, and patient-physician messaging via a mobile application. Physicians performed telemedical check-ups (TCUs) via a web-based platform, adjusting treatment as needed.
RESULTS: In the intervention group, variability in clinical scores and sensor-derived data was observed, particularly among those who experienced MG-related hospitalizations or exacerbations (H&E subgroup). This subgroup showed larger MG-ADL score fluctuations (mean range: 5.8 vs. 2.6 points), sent more messages, had more steroid dose adjustments (40% vs. 0%), and more frequent TCU interventions (93.3% vs. 60%) than the Non-H&E subgroup.
INTERPRETATION: Telemedical platforms in MG might detect early signs of worsening. High-risk patients (H&E subgroup) require increased medical support, which can be effectively addressed through MyaLink.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered under the German clinical trial registry (DRKS00029907).