International journal of cardiology · 2024
Catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia and health resource utilization and expenditures: A propensity-matched cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chew Derek S, Sacks Naomi C, Emden Maia R, Cyr Philip L, Sherwood Rick, Pokorney Sean D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Few data are available regarding temporal patterns of health resource utilization (HRU) and expenditures among patients undergoing catheter ablation for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). This study aimed to describe expenditures and HRU in patients with PSVT who underwent catheter ablation compared to a matched cohort of patients on medical therapy alone.
METHODS: Using a large US administrative database, we identified adult patients (age 18 to 65 years) with a new PSVT diagnosis between 2008 and 2016. Propensity-score matching was used to assemble a PSVT cohort treated with ablation or medical therapy alone (N = 2556). Longitudinal trends in HRU and expenditures in the 3-years preceding and following PSVT diagnosis were compared.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in expenditures between groups except within the first year after PSVT diagnosis: $48,004 ablation vs. $17,560 medical therapy (p < 0.001). This difference was driven by procedural expenditures, where the mean cost of catheter ablation was $32,057 ± SD 26,737. In Years 2 and 3 post-ablation, HRU and expenditures decreased to the levels associated with the medical therapy group, although fewer ablation patients required any prescription for beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or anti-arrhythmic drugs (32% ablation vs. 42% medical therapy group, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation reduces medication burden in PSVT, yet health resource use and expenditures were similar beyond 2 years post-ablation when compared to PSVT patients on medical therapy alone. Additional studies are required to better understand drivers of these sustained health expenditures, and barriers to achieving cost-savings for a potentially curative procedure.
METHODS: Using a large US administrative database, we identified adult patients (age 18 to 65 years) with a new PSVT diagnosis between 2008 and 2016. Propensity-score matching was used to assemble a PSVT cohort treated with ablation or medical therapy alone (N = 2556). Longitudinal trends in HRU and expenditures in the 3-years preceding and following PSVT diagnosis were compared.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in expenditures between groups except within the first year after PSVT diagnosis: $48,004 ablation vs. $17,560 medical therapy (p < 0.001). This difference was driven by procedural expenditures, where the mean cost of catheter ablation was $32,057 ± SD 26,737. In Years 2 and 3 post-ablation, HRU and expenditures decreased to the levels associated with the medical therapy group, although fewer ablation patients required any prescription for beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or anti-arrhythmic drugs (32% ablation vs. 42% medical therapy group, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation reduces medication burden in PSVT, yet health resource use and expenditures were similar beyond 2 years post-ablation when compared to PSVT patients on medical therapy alone. Additional studies are required to better understand drivers of these sustained health expenditures, and barriers to achieving cost-savings for a potentially curative procedure.