MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/nmo.13709

Медицинская библиотека · Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019

The projection of anorectal afferents to cortex of the rat: Comparison of two methods of cortical mapping.

Turner Keira, Pickering Mark, O'Connell P Ronan, Jones James F X

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The rat has served usefully as a model for fecal incontinence and exploration of the mechanism of action of sacral neuromodulation. However, there is a gap in knowledge concerning representation(s) on the primary sensory cortex of this anatomical region.

METHODS

Multi-electrode array (32 channels) and intrinsic optical signal (IOS) processing were used to map cortical activation sites following anorectal electrical stimulation in the rat. A simple method for expanding a 32-electrode array to a virtual 2700 array was refined.

KEY

RESULTS

The IOS method identified activation of parietal cortex following anorectal or first sacral nerve root (S1) stimulation; however, the signal was poorly localized and large spontaneous vasomotion was observed in pial vessels. In contrast, the resulting high-density maps showed two anatomically distinct cortical activation sites to anorectal stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: There are two distinct sites of activation on the parietal cortex following anorectal stimulation in the rat. The implications for sacral neuromodulation as a therapy for fecal incontinence are discussed.

Для цитирования: Turner Keira, Pickering Mark, O'Connell P Ronan, Jones James F X. The projection of anorectal afferents to cortex of the rat: Comparison of two methods of cortical mapping.. Neurogastroenterology and motility. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13709.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.