MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3343/alm.2024.0089

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of laboratory medicine · 2024

Assessing the Relevance of Non-molecular Prognostic Systems for Myelodysplastic Syndrome in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.

Lincango Marco, Andreoli Verónica, Rivello Hernán García, Bender Andrea, Catalán Ana I, Rahhal Marilina, Delamer Rocío, Asinari Mariana, Orgueira Adrián Mosquera, Castro María Belén, Osorio María José Mela, Navickas Alicia, Grille Sofia, Agriello Evangelina, Arbelbide Jorge, Basquiera Ana Lisa, Belli Carolina B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) has improved the prediction of clinical outcomes for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The Artificial Intelligence Prognostic Scoring System for MDS (AIPSS-MDS), based on classical clinical parameters, has outperformed the IPSS, revised version (IPSS-R). For the first time, we validated the IPSS-M and other molecular prognostic models and compared them with the established IPSS-R and AIPSS-MDS models using data from South American patients.

METHODS

Molecular and clinical data from 145 patients with MDS and 37 patients with MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Prognostic power evaluation revealed that the IPSS-M (Harrell's concordance [C]-index: 0.75, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.68) predicted overall survival better than the European MDS (EuroMDS; C-index: 0.72, AUC: 0.68) and Munich Leukemia Laboratory (MLL) (C-index: 0.70, AUC: 0.64) models. The IPSS-M prognostic discrimination was similar to that of the AIPSS-MDS model (C-index: 0.74, AUC: 0.66) and outperformed the IPSS-R model (C-index: 0.70, AUC: 0.61). Considering simplified low- and high-risk groups for clinical management, after restratifying from IPSS-R (57% and 32%, respectively, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.8; P=0.002) to IPSS-M, 12.6% of patients were upstaged, and 5% were downstaged (HR: 2.9; P=0.001). The AIPSS-MDS recategorized 51% of the low-risk cohort as high-risk, with no patients being downstaged (HR: 5.6; P<0.001), consistent with most patients requiring disease-modifying therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The IPSS-M and AIPSS-MDS models provide more accurate survival prognoses than the IPSS-R, EuroMDS, and MLL models. The AIPSS-MDS model is a valid option for assessing risks for all patients with MDS, especially in resource-limited centers where molecular testing is not currently a standard clinical practice.

Для цитирования: Lincango Marco, Andreoli Verónica, Rivello Hernán García, Bender Andrea, Catalán Ana I, Rahhal Marilina, Delamer Rocío, Asinari Mariana, Orgueira Adrián Mosquera, Castro María Belén, Osorio María José Mela, Navickas Alicia, Grille Sofia, Agriello Evangelina, Arbelbide Jorge, Basquiera Ana Lisa, Belli Carolina B. Assessing the Relevance of Non-molecular Prognostic Systems for Myelodysplastic Syndrome in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.. Annals of laboratory medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2024.0089.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.