MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00384-008-0632-8

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of colorectal disease · 2009

Topical anal fissure treatment: placebo-controlled study of mononitrate and trinitrate therapies.

Tankova Ludmila, Yoncheva Krassimira, Kovatchki Daniel, Doytchinova I

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: The present study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two nitrate gels, containing isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN) or glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), in the therapy of chronic anal fissure.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: 0.1% ISMN gel (21 patients), 0.1% GTN gel (21 patients) and a placebo group (ten patients). The ethic committee of our hospital approved the protocol and informed consent was obtained from all participants. All patients underwent clinical examination, visual inspection of the fissure and anal manometry prior to and after therapy.

RESULTS

The chronic anal fissure was completely healed in 71% of the patients treated with ISMN, 67% with GTN and in 30% from the placebo group. One patient in the ISMN group reported mild headache. Three patients in the GTN group had anal burning.

CONCLUSION

Both topical nitrate treatments (ISMN and GTN) were effective for chronic anal fissures. The reduction of the anal pressure was slightly higher after ISMN treatment (28%) than the treatment with GTN (23%). However, the statistical difference was not significant (p>0.05).

Для цитирования: Tankova Ludmila, Yoncheva Krassimira, Kovatchki Daniel, Doytchinova I. Topical anal fissure treatment: placebo-controlled study of mononitrate and trinitrate therapies.. International journal of colorectal disease. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-008-0632-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.