General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023
Risk factor analysis for aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement in patients with tricuspid aortic valve.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tamagawa Yuki, Kawamura Masashi, Shibata Kana, Asada Satoshi, Ryugo Masahiro, Tsutsumi Yasush I, Monta Osamu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Aortic dilatation concurrent with aortic valve disease is a common condition. However, the incidence of aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement for tricuspid aortic valve has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we performed a risk factor analysis for the incidence of aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement in patients with tricuspid aortic valve.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 599 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement at our hospital between January 2000 and December 2020. We performed a risk factor analysis for the incidence of aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement in patients with tricuspid aortic valve.
RESULTS: Seven patients developed late aortic dissections during the follow-up period. All patients with aortic dissection underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation. Multivariable analysis revealed that aortic regurgitation was an independent predictor of aortic dissection (p < 0.0001). The mean ascending aortic diameter at aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation was significantly greater in patients with aortic dissection than in those without aortic dissection (46 [43.5-46] mm vs. 39 [36-42] mm, p < 0.001). The predictive cutoff value of ascending aortic diameter was indicated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis; 46.0 mm (area under the curve: 0.8987). Freedom rates from aortic dissection in patients with aortic regurgitation and an ascending aortic diameter ≥ 46 mm were significantly lower than those in patients with an ascending aortic diameter < 46 mm (66.7% vs. 100% at 5 years, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Aortic regurgitation combined with ascending aortic dilatation at aortic valve replacement could be a significant risk factor for late aortic dissection.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 599 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement at our hospital between January 2000 and December 2020. We performed a risk factor analysis for the incidence of aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement in patients with tricuspid aortic valve.
RESULTS: Seven patients developed late aortic dissections during the follow-up period. All patients with aortic dissection underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation. Multivariable analysis revealed that aortic regurgitation was an independent predictor of aortic dissection (p < 0.0001). The mean ascending aortic diameter at aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation was significantly greater in patients with aortic dissection than in those without aortic dissection (46 [43.5-46] mm vs. 39 [36-42] mm, p < 0.001). The predictive cutoff value of ascending aortic diameter was indicated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis; 46.0 mm (area under the curve: 0.8987). Freedom rates from aortic dissection in patients with aortic regurgitation and an ascending aortic diameter ≥ 46 mm were significantly lower than those in patients with an ascending aortic diameter < 46 mm (66.7% vs. 100% at 5 years, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Aortic regurgitation combined with ascending aortic dilatation at aortic valve replacement could be a significant risk factor for late aortic dissection.