Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2025
Comparative analysis of recurrence rates: Day-light versus red-light photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratosis during a five-year follow-up.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Peiru, Yang Yutong, Zhao Yan, Cao Yajin, Zhou Zhongxia, Zhang Guolong, Zhang Linglin, Wang Xiuli
Аннотация
SIGNIFICANCE: Day-light photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) was proved to be effective, better tolerated and nearly painless compared with red-light photodynamic therapy (RL-PDT) in actinic keratosis (AK) patients in China. But no study has compared the recurrence rates of these two methods.
APPROACH: A prospective cohort study was conducted to compare the recurrence rate of DL-PDT and RL-PDT during a five-year follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were finally included, with 24 patients in the DL-PDT group and 31 patients in the RL-PDT group. The overall recurrence rate in the DL-PDT group was significantly higher than that in the RL-PDT group (62.50 % vs. 9.68 %, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rate of DL-PDT was significantly higher than that of RL-PDT.
APPROACH: A prospective cohort study was conducted to compare the recurrence rate of DL-PDT and RL-PDT during a five-year follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were finally included, with 24 patients in the DL-PDT group and 31 patients in the RL-PDT group. The overall recurrence rate in the DL-PDT group was significantly higher than that in the RL-PDT group (62.50 % vs. 9.68 %, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rate of DL-PDT was significantly higher than that of RL-PDT.