Strategies for Pediatric Diaphyseal Bone Reconstruction of the Lower Limb After Oncologic Resection: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Romain Huguet, Vincent Crenn, Louis-Romée Le Nail, Valérie Dumaine, Franck Chotel, Antoine Josse, Sylvain Briand, Charles Court, Tristan Langlais, François Gouin, Philippe Gicquel, Luc Jouve Jean, Philippe Anract, Thomas Amouyel, Damien Fron, Fabrice Fiorenza, Pierre Gominard, Florent Gaillard, Jean-Christophe Ruzic, Goulven Rochcongar, Eloïse Noll, Thierry Fabre, Alexandre Rochwerger, Bernard Fraisse, Philippe Violas, David Brinkert, Gualter Vaz, Louis Courtot, Sebastien Raux, David Biau, Eric Mascard, Mickael Ropars, Camille Mattei Jean, Antoine Chalopin
Аннотация
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What are the consolidation outcomes after biological reconstruction of pediatric lower-limb diaphyseal defects? (2) Which factors are associated with time to bone union? (3) What are the complication and revision profiles of these reconstruction strategies?
METHODS: We conducted a national multicenter retrospective study including pediatric patients (<18 years) who underwent diaphyseal resection of the femur or tibia for malignant bone tumors or adamantinoma between 2004 and 2024. Patients were reconstructed using IMT, VFG, or CAVFG. The primary endpoint was radiographic consolidation at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included overall union rate, time to union, complications, and revision surgery. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.
RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were included (IMT 69, VFG 22, CAVFG 42). Overall bone union was achieved in 72.9% of patients, with no significant difference between reconstruction techniques (IMT 75.4%, VFG 81.8%, CAVFG 64.3%; p = 0.272). Consolidation at 1 year, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, occurred in 35.2% of cases. Median time to union was 18 months and did not differ significantly between techniques. Tibial localization was independently associated with higher union rates (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.19-12.8; p = 0.024) and shorter time to union (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.06-3.38; p = 0.032). Complications occurred in 64.1% of patients and 57% required revision surgery, without differences between techniques.
CONCLUSION: Biological reconstruction of pediatric lower-limb diaphyseal defects allows limb salvage with acceptable union rates but prolonged healing and high complication rates. No technique demonstrated clear superiority, supporting an individualized reconstruction strategy based primarily on anatomical and mechanical considerations.