MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cllc.2026.04.003

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical lung cancer · 2026

ENTRÉE Lung Platform Trial Sub-study 1: Phase II Randomized Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Feladilimab Plus Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel Monotherapy in Advanced/Recurrent NSCLC.

Garassino Marina Chiara, Cousin Sophie, Besse Benjamin, Sacher Adrian, Orlov Sergey, Schenker Michael, Felip Enriqueta, Gladkov Oleg, Messina Cristina H, Majumdar Antara, Wu Zhenhua Jeremy, Karpinich Natalie O, Hirschfeld Steven, Ballas Marc, Reck Martin

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование II фазыМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Combining treatments with different mechanisms may improve immunosurveillance and outcomes in advanced/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after immunotherapy. ENTRÉE Lung (NCT03739710) is a phase 2, open-label platform trial utilizing a master protocol to investigate novel regimens versus standard of care (SoC) in separate sub-studies. Sub-study 1 investigated the immunoglobulin G4 inducible T-cell costimulator agonist antibody, feladilimab, plus docetaxel versus SoC, docetaxel monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Patients with advanced/recurrent NSCLC who progressed on prior anti-programmed cell death (ligand)-1 and platinum-based combination chemotherapies were randomized to feladilimab (80 mg) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (both intravenous) or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks until progressive disease/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response (including overall response rate [ORR]), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included biomarkers.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were randomized to feladilimab plus docetaxel (n = 70) or docetaxel (n = 35). Median OS was 7.8 months with feladilimab plus docetaxel versus 8.2 months with docetaxel; hazard ratio (HR) 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92, 2.44). Median PFS for feladilimab plus docetaxel versus docetaxel was 3.4 months versus 3.3 months, and ORR was 19% versus 11%; HR 0.84 (95% CI, 0.54, 1.32). Most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events included anemia (34% vs. 24%), nausea (34% vs. 15%), alopecia (27% vs. 21%), and asthenia (27% vs. 18%).

CONCLUSION

Feladilimab plus docetaxel has an acceptable safety profile in the second-line treatment of advanced/recurrent NSCLC. No survival outcomes or tumor response advantages were observed with the addition of feladilimab to docetaxel in this setting.

Для цитирования: Garassino Marina Chiara, Cousin Sophie, Besse Benjamin, Sacher Adrian, Orlov Sergey, Schenker Michael, Felip Enriqueta, Gladkov Oleg, Messina Cristina H, Majumdar Antara, Wu Zhenhua Jeremy, Karpinich Natalie O, Hirschfeld Steven, Ballas Marc, Reck Martin. ENTRÉE Lung Platform Trial Sub-study 1: Phase II Randomized Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Feladilimab Plus Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel Monotherapy in Advanced/Recurrent NSCLC.. Clinical lung cancer. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2026.04.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.