International journal of cardiology · 2025
Distinct lipoprotein contributions to valvular heart disease: Insights from genetic analysis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Luo Da, Björnson Elias, Wang Xiaoying, Zhang Bofang, Xu Changwu, Guan Yunlong, Xiang Shizhen, Borén Jan, Hao Xingjie, Chen Jing
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The per-particle pathogenicity of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] with risk of valvular heart diseases (VHD) other than aortic stenosis compared with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) remains unclear.
METHODS: Single-nucleotide polymorphism specific clusters associated with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), VLDL cholesterol (VLDL-C) and Lp(a) were identified. The relationships of genetically predicted variation in apolipoprotein B (apoB) in these lipoproteins with risk of VHD and its major types (aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation) were evaluated to determine the comparative pathogenicity by Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.
RESULTS: The VHD odds ratio (OR) per 1 g/L higher apoB was 1.09 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.15] in LDL vs. 1.45 (95 % CI 1.25-1.69) in VLDL vs. 2.71 (95 % CI 1.92-3.82) in Lp(a) based on the cluster-based MR analyses. The polygenic scores for each lipoprotein weighted by apoB similarly showed a greater OR of VHD per 1 g/L apoB in VLDL [1.20 (95 % CI 1.06-1.37)] and in Lp(a) [2.54, (95 % CI 1.95-3.32)] compared with that in LDL [1.05 (95 % CI 1.01-1.08)]. Multivariable MR analyses further revealed the strong effects of VLDL-C and Lp(a) on VHD risk independent of LDL-C. In addition, significant associations between Lp(a) and all three major types of VHD were observed, while LDL and VLDL had no impact on aortic and mitral regurgitation.
CONCLUSIONS: VLDL and Lp(a) appear to have significantly greater per-particle pathogenicity in VHD compared to LDL. The distinct impacts of lipoproteins on different VHD subtypes suggest the inadequacy of just focusing on LDL-lowering treatment for valve disorders.
METHODS: Single-nucleotide polymorphism specific clusters associated with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), VLDL cholesterol (VLDL-C) and Lp(a) were identified. The relationships of genetically predicted variation in apolipoprotein B (apoB) in these lipoproteins with risk of VHD and its major types (aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation) were evaluated to determine the comparative pathogenicity by Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.
RESULTS: The VHD odds ratio (OR) per 1 g/L higher apoB was 1.09 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.15] in LDL vs. 1.45 (95 % CI 1.25-1.69) in VLDL vs. 2.71 (95 % CI 1.92-3.82) in Lp(a) based on the cluster-based MR analyses. The polygenic scores for each lipoprotein weighted by apoB similarly showed a greater OR of VHD per 1 g/L apoB in VLDL [1.20 (95 % CI 1.06-1.37)] and in Lp(a) [2.54, (95 % CI 1.95-3.32)] compared with that in LDL [1.05 (95 % CI 1.01-1.08)]. Multivariable MR analyses further revealed the strong effects of VLDL-C and Lp(a) on VHD risk independent of LDL-C. In addition, significant associations between Lp(a) and all three major types of VHD were observed, while LDL and VLDL had no impact on aortic and mitral regurgitation.
CONCLUSIONS: VLDL and Lp(a) appear to have significantly greater per-particle pathogenicity in VHD compared to LDL. The distinct impacts of lipoproteins on different VHD subtypes suggest the inadequacy of just focusing on LDL-lowering treatment for valve disorders.