MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.12.009

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022

Distal aortic progression following acute type A aortic dissection repair among patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.

Titsworth Marc, Graham Nathan J, Orelaru Felix, Ahmad Rana-Armaghan, Wu Xiaoting, Kim Karen M, Fukuhara Shinichi, Patel Himanshu, Deeb G Michael, Yang Bo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to analyze long-term growth and outcomes of the distal aorta after open acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients with bicuspid aortic valves or tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease.

METHODS

From 1996 to 2021, 60 patients with bicuspid aortic valves and 655 patients with tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease underwent open repair for acute type A aortic dissection. Data were collected from the local Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, medical record review, surveys, and the National Death Index and Michigan Death Index (December 12, 2021).

RESULTS

Compared with the tricuspid aortic valve group, the bicuspid aortic valve group was significantly younger, had more severe aortic insufficiency (33% vs 22%, P = .05), and had less hypertension (67% vs 78%, P = .05). Intraoperatively, patients with bicuspid aortic valves received more aortic root replacements (70% vs 26%, P < .001), less zone 2 aortic arch replacement (8.3% vs 20%, P = .03), and longer median cardiopulmonary bypass (233 vs 214 minutes, P = .05) and aortic crossclamp (184 vs 141 minutes, P < .001) times. The average annual aortic arch growth rate (0.23 mm/year vs 0.39 mm/year, P = .52) and descending aorta growth rate (0.61 mm/year vs 0.79 mm/year, P = .39) were similar between the bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve groups. The bicuspid aortic valve group had lower annual abdominal aorta growth (0.51 mm/year vs 0.68 mm/year, P = .03). The cumulative incidence of reoperation for the distal aorta (9.7% vs 16.0%, P = .77) was similar between the bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve groups. The 10-year survival was higher in the bicuspid aortic valve group (75.4% vs 66.0%, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with bicuspid aortic valves could be treated similarly as patients with tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease in the setting of open acute type A aortic dissection repair.

Для цитирования: Titsworth Marc, Graham Nathan J, Orelaru Felix, Ahmad Rana-Armaghan, Wu Xiaoting, Kim Karen M, Fukuhara Shinichi, Patel Himanshu, Deeb G Michael, Yang Bo. Distal aortic progression following acute type A aortic dissection repair among patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.12.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.