DOI 10.1097/wco.0b013e3283013983
Central nervous system infections in the systemic vasculitides.
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Central nervous system infections are not uncommon in systemic vasculitides. Being vigilant of central nervous system infections as an alternative consideration, instead of systemic vasculitides per se, could prove to be lifesaving in certain circumstances.
RECENT FINDINGS: Common pathogens, such as tuberculosis, Cryptococcus, and Listeria, still occur commonly as the major causes of central nervous system infection in systemic vasculitides. However, rare pathogens could be responsible among those immunocompromised hosts, and they should not be overlooked. The manifestation of central nervous system infection tends to be atypical among systemic vasculitides patients. History, physical, and cerebrospinal fluid analyses are still time-honored approaches to establishing the correct diagnosis. Newer techniques such as interferon-gamma release assay for tuberculosis, cerebrospinal fluid cytokine, or chemokine profiling need further validation and careful interpretation among such a special patient population. Immune disturbance, mainly due to immunosuppressive therapy, and polymorphism of the innate immune pathway (for example, Toll-like receptor) could be susceptibility factors for certain central nervous system infections. The biologic agents (for example, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha, and B-cell depletion therapy) represent novel methods for treating systemic vasculitides, but they raise a critical issue owing to their increased likelihood for being associated with opportunistic infections.
SUMMARY: Despite the recent progress in this special field, the mortality of central nervous system infection in systemic vasculitides is still high, and the prognostic factors are still largely undetermined.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.