MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1586/14737167.8.3.233

Медицинская библиотека · Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2008

Pharmacoeconomics of levocetirizine in allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria: considerations for the USA.

Dubuske Lawrence M, Seal Brian, Brown Martin Cj

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Levocetirizine, a recent, second-generation oral antihistamine, was approved by the US FDA in May 2007 to treat symptoms of allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.

OBJECTIVE

To review the economic literature for levocetirizine.

METHODS

Two reviewers conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify abstracts that met the inclusion criteria. Abstracts that were considered acceptable were retrieved with full text for further assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 82 potential studies were identified. After reviewing abstracts, 11 articles were preselected for potential inclusion. Of the 11 full-text articles, three articles met the inclusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacoeconomic literature for levocetirizine was limited. The findings were consistent across the literature, suggesting levocetirizine improved outcomes, leading to incremental cost savings and cost-effectiveness. Since many of the available levocetirizine data come from European studies, differences in practice patterns and medical resources should be considered when extrapolating data to a US clinical setting.

Для цитирования: Dubuske Lawrence M, Seal Brian, Brown Martin Cj. Pharmacoeconomics of levocetirizine in allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria: considerations for the USA.. Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research. 2008. DOI: 10.1586/14737167.8.3.233.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.