MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.6168

Медицинская библиотека · Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2007

Abnormal brain MRI signals in the splenium of the corpus callosum, basal ganglia and internal capsule in a suspected case with tuberculous meningitis.

Hirotani Makoto, Yabe Ichiro, Hamada Shinsuke, Tsuji Sachiko, Kikuchi Seiji, Sasaki Hidenao

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 34-year-old man visited the hospital with chief complaints of headache, fever, and disturbance of consciousness. In view of his clinical condition, the course of the disease, and results of examination, he was diagnosed with viral meningitis and treated accordingly. However, his clinical condition worsened, and MRI revealed abnormal signals in the splenium of the corpus callosum, in the basal ganglia and in the internal capsule, as well as the presence of severe inflammation in the base of the brain. Since he had a high ADA level in the cerebrospinal fluid and was consequently suspected to have tuberculous meningitis, he was placed on antitubercular agents. Then, his clinical condition began to improve. Additional steroid pulse therapy further improved his condition, and abnormal signals in the splenium of the corpus callosum and the basal ganglia resolved. This valuable case suggests that an immune mechanism contributed to the occurrence of central nervous system symptoms associated with tuberculous meningitis.

Для цитирования: Hirotani Makoto, Yabe Ichiro, Hamada Shinsuke, Tsuji Sachiko, Kikuchi Seiji, Sasaki Hidenao. Abnormal brain MRI signals in the splenium of the corpus callosum, basal ganglia and internal capsule in a suspected case with tuberculous meningitis.. Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan). 2007. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.6168.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.