Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
Phenotypic Trajectories From Acute to Stable Phase in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the PURSUIT-HFpEF Study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsuoka Yuki, Sotomi Yohei, Nakatani Daisaku, Okada Katsuki, Sunaga Akihiro, Kida Hirota, Sato Taiki, Sakamoto Daisuke, Kitamura Tetsuhisa, Komukai Sho, Seo Masahiro, Yano Masamichi, Hayashi Takaharu, Nakagawa Akito, Nakagawa Yusuke, Tamaki Shunsuke, Yasumura Yoshio, Yamada Takahisa, Hikoso Shungo, Sakata Yasushi, OCVC‐Heart Failure Investigators
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Using machine learning for the phenotyping of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has emerged as a novel approach to understanding the pathophysiology and stratifying the patients. Our objective is to perform phenotyping of patients with HFpEF in stable phase and to investigate the phenotypic trajectory from acute worsening phase to stable phase.
METHODS: The present study is a post hoc analysis of the PURSUIT-HFpEF (Prospective Multicenter Observational Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction) study. We applied the latent class analysis to the discharge data of patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure.
RESULTS: We finally included patient data of 1100 cases and 63 features in the latent class analysis. All patients were subclassified into 5 phenogroups as follows: Phenotype 1, characterized by better renal function and lower NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) level [N=325 (29.5%)]; Phenotype 2, higher blood pressure, sinus rhythm, and poor renal function. [N=242 (22.0%)]; Phenotype 3, higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, higher tricuspid pressure gradient, and lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [N=214 (19.5%)]; Phenotype 4, higher C-reactive protein level and higher tricuspid pressure gradient [N=245 (22.3%)]; and Phenotype 5, poor nutritional status, poor renal function, and higher NT-proBNP level [N=74 (6.7%)]. A particular phenotype observed at the time of discharge was correlated with a distinct phenotype of acute worsening.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified 5 distinct stable phase phenotypes of the patients with HFpEF from the data at discharge. A specific phenotype at discharge was associated with a particular phenotype of acute worsening. This grouping can be a basis for future precision medicine of patients with HFpEF.
REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000021831.
METHODS: The present study is a post hoc analysis of the PURSUIT-HFpEF (Prospective Multicenter Observational Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction) study. We applied the latent class analysis to the discharge data of patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure.
RESULTS: We finally included patient data of 1100 cases and 63 features in the latent class analysis. All patients were subclassified into 5 phenogroups as follows: Phenotype 1, characterized by better renal function and lower NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) level [N=325 (29.5%)]; Phenotype 2, higher blood pressure, sinus rhythm, and poor renal function. [N=242 (22.0%)]; Phenotype 3, higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, higher tricuspid pressure gradient, and lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [N=214 (19.5%)]; Phenotype 4, higher C-reactive protein level and higher tricuspid pressure gradient [N=245 (22.3%)]; and Phenotype 5, poor nutritional status, poor renal function, and higher NT-proBNP level [N=74 (6.7%)]. A particular phenotype observed at the time of discharge was correlated with a distinct phenotype of acute worsening.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified 5 distinct stable phase phenotypes of the patients with HFpEF from the data at discharge. A specific phenotype at discharge was associated with a particular phenotype of acute worsening. This grouping can be a basis for future precision medicine of patients with HFpEF.
REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000021831.