Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2022
OCT-1 Expression in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparative Analysis with Respect to Response to Imatinib Treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ito Yasuhiro, Takeda Tsutomu, Sasaki Yo, Sakon Masato, Yamada Terumasa, Ishiguro Shingo, Imaoka Shingi, Tsujimoto Masahiko, Monden Morito, Matsuura Nariaki
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Trigger finger, a common condition caused by flexor tendon compression in adults, often requires surgical release when conservative treatment fails. This study retrospectively compared the outcomes and costs of percutaneous needle release and traditional open release to treat trigger fingers.Article title is mismatch between Job sheet and author provided manuscript. Kindly check and confirm.Thank you for pointing this out. The correct form of the title is:"Comparison of Open and Percutaneous Treatment in Trigger Finger: A Retrospective Analysis of Functional Results and Cost-Effectiveness."Please use "Cost-Effectiveness" with a capital E.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients over 18 undergoing trigger finger surgery was conducted (n = 92). The patients were divided into two groups: open surgery (n = 43) and percutaneous release (n = 49). Treatment outcomes were assessed using the Gilbert questionnaire (failure, complications, and satisfaction), and functional outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. The cost analysis was based on social security billing.
RESULTS: The mean quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores are 10 ± 5.7 for the percutaneous group and 10.4 ± 5.7 for the open surgery group (p = 0.69). Finger stiffness was reported in 2% of the percutaneous group and 30% of the open surgery group (p = 0.03), whereas scarring was observed in 0% of the percutaneous group and 23% of the open surgery group (p < 0.01). Returning to daily work was faster in the percutaneous group, with 67% resuming within a week compared to 0% in the open group (p < 0.01). The procedure costs averaged 156.3 ± 6.6 United States dollars for the percutaneous group and 182.9 ± 24.2 USD (United States dollars) for the open surgery group (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous needle release appears to be a more cost-effective alternative to traditional open surgery for the trigger finger, with similar functional outcomes, faster recovery, fewer complications, and lower costs.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients over 18 undergoing trigger finger surgery was conducted (n = 92). The patients were divided into two groups: open surgery (n = 43) and percutaneous release (n = 49). Treatment outcomes were assessed using the Gilbert questionnaire (failure, complications, and satisfaction), and functional outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. The cost analysis was based on social security billing.
RESULTS: The mean quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores are 10 ± 5.7 for the percutaneous group and 10.4 ± 5.7 for the open surgery group (p = 0.69). Finger stiffness was reported in 2% of the percutaneous group and 30% of the open surgery group (p = 0.03), whereas scarring was observed in 0% of the percutaneous group and 23% of the open surgery group (p < 0.01). Returning to daily work was faster in the percutaneous group, with 67% resuming within a week compared to 0% in the open group (p < 0.01). The procedure costs averaged 156.3 ± 6.6 United States dollars for the percutaneous group and 182.9 ± 24.2 USD (United States dollars) for the open surgery group (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous needle release appears to be a more cost-effective alternative to traditional open surgery for the trigger finger, with similar functional outcomes, faster recovery, fewer complications, and lower costs.