MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug · 2009

Photopatch testing of 182 patients: a 6-year experience at the Mayo Clinic.

Scalf Leigh Ann, Davis Mark D P, Rohlinger Audrey L, Connolly Suzanne M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Photopatch testing is important for diagnosing photoallergic contact dermatitis. Although results of photopatch testing have been presented from many European centers, there have been few reports of the results of photopatch testing in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To review the Mayo Clinic's recent experience with photopatch testing, identify common photoallergens, and compare our current and previous findings.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent photopatch testing at the Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005 (N = 182).

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients (29.7%) had photoallergic contact reactions, and 29 (15.9%) had allergic contact reactions. The most common photoallergens were medications, sunscreen agents, fragrances, and antiseptics.

CONCLUSION

Photopatch testing is the technique useful in identifying photoallergens. The series of allergens used must be constantly updated to reflect newly identified and outdated photoallergens. We present a 6-year experience with photopatch testing. Medications, sunscreen agents, fragrances, and antiseptics were the most frequently identified photoallergens.

Для цитирования: Scalf Leigh Ann, Davis Mark D P, Rohlinger Audrey L, Connolly Suzanne M. Photopatch testing of 182 patients: a 6-year experience at the Mayo Clinic.. Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug. 2009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.