DOI 10.1038/s41393-026-01242-w
Determinants for improving respiratory muscle training after spinal cord injury using real-world clinical data.
Аннотация
STUDY
DESIGN
Single-center, retrospective analysis of real-world clinical data.
OBJECTIVES
To quantify the influence of personal, lesion-, and training-specific parameters on improvements in inspiratory training resistance during a respiratory muscle training period in persons with SCI.
SETTING
SCI rehabilitation hospital in Switzerland.
METHODS
Men and women with traumatic or non-traumatic SCI, 18 years or older, who performed at least 10 inspiratory training sessions with a preliminary measurement of maximal inspiratory muscle strength (MIP) were included. Inspiratory resistance training was conducted in a group setting of the physiotherapy department. Training prescription: 7 × 10 repetitions per training session at the highest possible intensity, 3-5 times a week during the inpatient rehabilitation stay. Demographic data and training parameters were summarized by median with 25 and 75% percentiles or absolute and relative frequencies. Most important parameters (personal and lesion characteristic as well as training volume and intensity) for improvement of inspiratory training resistance were analyzed by a random forest and an explanatory linear model.
RESULTS
Training intensity and the total number of training sessions have a much greater impact on improvements in inspiratory training resistance than personal or lesion characteristics. Our model showed an adjusted R² of 0.50.
CONCLUSIONS
While performing respiratory muscle training in persons with SCI, therapists should focus on a high training intensity, i.e. setting the inspiratory resistance as high as possible, and motivating patients to perform the training for as long as possible, preferably more than 3 months.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.