MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/cancers17203392

Медицинская библиотека · Cancers · 2025

The Central Anatomical Question: Treatment of Lymphoma Within Border-Zone Anatomical Sites Adjacent to the Central Nervous System.

Marsters Candace, Phua Chai, MacDonald Maria, Boldt Gabriel, Climans Seth

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Lymphomas involving the central nervous system (CNS) have worse outcomes, including both primary and secondary CNS lymphomas, which are associated with poorer overall survival outcomes. The World Health Organization classifies CNS lymphoma as arising from the brain, leptomeninges, and spinal cord, but this simplified CNS anatomical definition fails to incorporate areas of ambiguity that can be clinically relevant for treatment decision making. In this article, we review the anatomical boundaries of CNS lymphoma within select border-zone biological structures located at the CNS borders in order to gain a consensus working definition of CNS disease boundaries. We review anatomical localizations with border-zone CNS boundaries, including the dura, cavernous sinus, circumventricular organs, pituitary gland, and cranial nerves. Though some portions of the eye would be considered CNS and others extra-CNS, recommendations for this structure are outside the scope of this review. Through this review, we examine the impact of lymphomatous invasion on select CNS-bordering anatomical structures, aiming to better define treatment categorization as CNS or extra-CNS, with a focus on B cell lymphoma types.

Для цитирования: Marsters Candace, Phua Chai, MacDonald Maria, Boldt Gabriel, Climans Seth. The Central Anatomical Question: Treatment of Lymphoma Within Border-Zone Anatomical Sites Adjacent to the Central Nervous System.. Cancers. 2025. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17203392.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.