MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/diagnostics16172748

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026

Digital Patient-Reported Monitoring of Functional Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Perioperative Hormonal Therapy.

Buhas Bogdan Adrian, Uleri Alessandro, Calleris Giorgio, Roubaud Guilhem, Lesourd Marine, Pradère Benjamin, Tollon Christophe, Pouessel Damien, Malavaud Bernard, Mourey Loïc, Ploussard Guillaume

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background/

Objectives

Perioperative androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) are increasingly used in high-risk prostate cancer, yet patient-centred functional-recovery data after radical prostatectomy are scarce and rarely standardized. We assessed whether a smartphone-based digital monitoring pathway could characterize social-continence recovery and capture differences associated with a perioperative hormonal therapy (PHT) strategy after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph-node dissection (RARP + LND).

Methods

In a two-centre consecutive cohort (n = 98) of men with high-risk, non-metastatic prostate cancer aligned with SUGAR and PROTEUS criteria, we compared upfront surgery (standard of care [SOC], n = 72) with a planned PHT strategy (ADT or ARPI, n = 26); all patients were urinary-continent preoperatively. Clinical data were prospective; patient-reported and patient-experience measures were captured through a routine-care digital platform (Betty Coaching application) delivering an identical prehabilitation/rehabilitation pathway to both groups, with pre- and postoperative pelvic-floor muscle training performed by all patients. The primary endpoint was 6-month social continence (0-1 pad/day), assessed by clinician and patient reports as co-primary sources. Differences are reported as risk differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

At 6 weeks, no statistically clear difference was observed (clinician 66.2% vs. 56.5%; risk difference 9.7 percentage points, 95% CI -12 to 32). At 6 months, social continence was lower with PHT (clinician 87.1% vs. 65.0%, difference 22.1 points, 95% CI 2.6 to 44.7; patient 81.3% vs. 58.3%, 22.9 points, 95% CI 2.4 to 43.9), converging by 12 months (96.9% vs. 95.0%). Analgesic-free rates were lower with PHT on postoperative days (POD) 7 and 10.

Conclusions

Digital monitoring captured granular recovery trajectories and identified a mid-term social-continence signal associated with PHT, compatible with a transient delay in recovery. These hypothesis-generating findings support embedding standardized digital functional-outcome monitoring in perioperative trials.

Для цитирования: Buhas Bogdan Adrian, Uleri Alessandro, Calleris Giorgio, Roubaud Guilhem, Lesourd Marine, Pradère Benjamin, Tollon Christophe, Pouessel Damien, Malavaud Bernard, Mourey Loïc, Ploussard Guillaume. Digital Patient-Reported Monitoring of Functional Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Perioperative Hormonal Therapy.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2026. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics16172748.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.