Enhancing Neuroanatomy Education for Medical Students Through the Development of Online Modules.

PURPOSE: Neuroanatomy is a cornerstone of medical education, yet its complexity often leads to student apprehension, termed "neurophobia." This quantitative study evaluated the effectiveness of online Functional Neuroanatomy modules in enhancing second-year medical students' understanding of neuroanatomy at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar during the 2024-25 academic year.

PARTICIPANTS AND

METHODS

Four functional neuroanatomy modules were developed: Brainstem Anatomy, Sensory Pathway, Motor Pathway, and Cranial Nerves. Each module featured a 15 to 20-minute animated video and accompanying pre- and post-module quizzes. Each module included 5-10 multiple-choice questions and labeling exercises targeting structure, function, and clinical correlation relationships through distinct clinical scenarios. Thirty-six students participated in this study by completing one or more modules. A survey was administered at the end of the final module to assess student perceptions of the modules' effectiveness, utility, and overall satisfaction. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired samples t-tests to compare pre- and post-quiz performance and independent t-tests to compare weekly quiz scores between participants and non-participants.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis showed significant improvement in post-module quiz scores across all modules (p < 0.001), indicating short-term learning gains. No significant difference was observed in official weekly neuroanatomy quiz scores between participants and non-participants (p > 0.05), possibly attributable to students' already strong baseline performance and access to multiple learning resources. Survey responses reflected high satisfaction, with students praising the modules' clarity, interactivity, and flexibility.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the effectiveness of neuroanatomy modules as a supplementary digital tool that enhances comprehension and addresses neurophobia. However, limitations, including small sample size, lack of long-term retention assessment, and reliance on quiz-based evaluation, warrant caution and suggest the need for more rigorous future studies.