Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2024
Review article: Faecal biomarkers for assessing small intestinal damage in coeliac disease and environmental enteropathy.
СтатьяСистематический обзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kivelä Laura, Lindfors Katri, Lundin Knut E A, Størdal Ketil
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In coeliac disease and environmental enteropathy, dietary gluten and enteric infections cause reversible inflammation and morphological changes to the small intestinal mucosa that can be detected in biopsy samples obtained by endoscopy. However, there is a clear need for non-invasive biomarkers. Constant shedding of mucosal material into the bowel lumen and faeces, together with easy availability of stool, makes it an interesting sample matrix.
AIMS: To conduct a systematic literature search and summarize the existing evidence for host mucosa-derived faecal biomarkers in evaluating small intestinal damage.
METHODS: We searched for studies on PubMed (MEDLINE) until 1 March 2024.
RESULTS: We identified 494 studies and included 35 original case-control and cohort studies. These assessed host mucosal transcripts and 14 other markers aiming specifically to reflect inflammation and cell-mediated, innate and gluten-induced immune responses. In coeliac disease, faecal calprotectin and anti-gliadin, tissue transglutaminase, endomysium and deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies were the most studied but with inconsistent results. Single studies reported positive findings about microRNA transcripts, β-defensin-2, lipocalin-2, zonulin-related proteins and angiotensin-converting enzyme. In environmental enteropathy, a non-significant association was reported between calprotectin and urine lactulose/mannitol ratio; there were conflicting results for neopterin, myeloperoxidase and host transcripts. Single studies reported a positive association for lactoferrin, and a negative association for regenerating islet-derived protein 1. Studies comparing faecal markers against small intestinal biopsy findings were not identified in environmental enteropathy.
CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to determine reliable faecal markers as a proxy for small intestinal mucosal damage.
AIMS: To conduct a systematic literature search and summarize the existing evidence for host mucosa-derived faecal biomarkers in evaluating small intestinal damage.
METHODS: We searched for studies on PubMed (MEDLINE) until 1 March 2024.
RESULTS: We identified 494 studies and included 35 original case-control and cohort studies. These assessed host mucosal transcripts and 14 other markers aiming specifically to reflect inflammation and cell-mediated, innate and gluten-induced immune responses. In coeliac disease, faecal calprotectin and anti-gliadin, tissue transglutaminase, endomysium and deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies were the most studied but with inconsistent results. Single studies reported positive findings about microRNA transcripts, β-defensin-2, lipocalin-2, zonulin-related proteins and angiotensin-converting enzyme. In environmental enteropathy, a non-significant association was reported between calprotectin and urine lactulose/mannitol ratio; there were conflicting results for neopterin, myeloperoxidase and host transcripts. Single studies reported a positive association for lactoferrin, and a negative association for regenerating islet-derived protein 1. Studies comparing faecal markers against small intestinal biopsy findings were not identified in environmental enteropathy.
CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to determine reliable faecal markers as a proxy for small intestinal mucosal damage.