Differentiating Postural and Kinetic Tremor Responses to Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor.

BACKGROUND

While deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of thalamus or posterior subthalamic area (PSA) can suppress forms of action tremor in people with Essential Tremor, previous studies have suggested postural tremor may respond more robustly than kinetic tremor to DBS.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to more precisely quantify the (1) onset/offset dynamics and (2) steady-state effects of VIM/PSA-DBS on postural and kinetic tremor.

METHODS

Tremor data from wireless inertial measurement units were collected from 11 participants with ET (20 unilaterally assessed DBS leads). Three postural hold tasks and one kinetic task were performed with stimulation turned off, in 2-min intervals after enabling unilateral DBS at the clinician-optimized DBS setting (15 min), and in 2-min intervals following cessation of DBS (5 min).

RESULTS

At baseline, kinetic tremor had significantly higher amplitudes, standard deviation, and frequency than postural tremor (P < 0.001). DBS had a more robust acute effect on postural tremors (54% decrease, P < 0.001), with near immediate tremor suppression in amplitude and standard deviation, but had non-significant improvement of kinetic tremor on the population-level across the wash-in period (34% decrease). Tremor response was not equivalent between wash-in and wash-out timepoints and involved substantial individual variability including task-specific rebound or long wash-out effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Programming strategies for VIM/PSA-DBS should consider the individual temporal and effect size variability in postural versus kinetic tremor improvement. Improved targeting and programming strategies around VIM and PSA may be necessary to equivalently suppress both postural and kinetic tremors.