American journal of speech-language pathology · 2022
Effects of Cognitive Stress on Voice Acoustics in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dahl Kimberly L, Stepp Cara E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Autonomic nervous system dysfunction has been implicated in the development and persistence of hyperfunctional voice disorders (HVDs). The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of cognitive stress, which is known to arouse the autonomic nervous system, on voice acoustics in female speakers with and without HVDs.
METHOD: Adult female speakers-66 with HVDs, 66 without-were recorded while speaking with and without a cognitive stressor. Root-mean-square (RMS) of amplitude, fundamental frequency (f o), low-to-high spectral energy ratio (L/H ratio), cepstral peak prominence (CPP), and relative f o (RFF) were measured for each speaker and cognitive stress condition. Mixed-model analyses of variance and post hoc t tests were conducted to determine if cognitive stress affected voice acoustics and whether voice changes were greater for those with HVDs.
RESULTS: All measures differed significantly under cognitive stress for speakers with and without HVDs. RMS and CPP increased whereas f o, CPP, and RFF decreased under cognitive stress. Changes in these measures were not greater in those with HVDs.
CONCLUSION: Cognitive stress and presumed autonomic arousal affect voice similarly in female speakers with and without HVDs.
METHOD: Adult female speakers-66 with HVDs, 66 without-were recorded while speaking with and without a cognitive stressor. Root-mean-square (RMS) of amplitude, fundamental frequency (f o), low-to-high spectral energy ratio (L/H ratio), cepstral peak prominence (CPP), and relative f o (RFF) were measured for each speaker and cognitive stress condition. Mixed-model analyses of variance and post hoc t tests were conducted to determine if cognitive stress affected voice acoustics and whether voice changes were greater for those with HVDs.
RESULTS: All measures differed significantly under cognitive stress for speakers with and without HVDs. RMS and CPP increased whereas f o, CPP, and RFF decreased under cognitive stress. Changes in these measures were not greater in those with HVDs.
CONCLUSION: Cognitive stress and presumed autonomic arousal affect voice similarly in female speakers with and without HVDs.