DOI 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106686
External validation of the GETTEC algorithm for elective neck dissection in patients candidates for salvage total laryngectomy.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To perform an external validation of the algorithm for elective treatment of the lymph node areas proposed by GETTEC for patients candidates to salvage total laryngectomy after radiotherapy. This algorithm is based on the initial lymph node status, local extension of the recurrence and time to recurrence.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Retrospective study performed in 151 patients treated with salvage total laryngectomy without clinical or radiological evidence of regional involvement at the time of diagnosis of recurrence (rcN0). The percentage of patients with occult lymph node metastases was calculated according to the algorithm proposed by GETTEC.
RESULTS
A total of 14.6 % (n = 22) of the patients had occult lymph node metastases. Patients with locally advanced recurrences (rcT4) had a higher risk of occult lymph node metastases. There were no significant differences in the risk of occult lymph node metastases according to initial lymph node status or time to recurrence. When applying the algorithm proposed by GETTEC, there were no significant differences in the percentage of occult lymph node metastases between the group of patients who were candidates for follow-up (14.4 %) and those candidates for elective neck dissection (14.9 %) (P = 0.940). According to our results, patients who were candidates for an elective neck dissection were those with tumors located in the supraglottis or rcT4 glottic tumors.
CONCLUSION
Our results do not validate the algorithm proposed by GETTEC for the management of the lymph nodes in rcN0 patients who are candidates for salvage total laryngectomy after radiotherapy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.