DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.12.004
External Pressure During Microlaryngeal Surgery - A New Device For Improved Visualization.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the need for external laryngeal counter pressure during microlaryngeal surgery (MLS) and to present a new device that can be used for improved visualization of the larynx during surgery.
METHODS
Patients who underwent MLS due to vocal fold pathology at Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden between January 1st, 2018, and December 31st, 2019, were retrospectively identified by their surgical classification code in the patient charts. Data regarding gender, age, diagnosis, the need for external pressure to the larynx, and complications were noted. A new innovative laryngoscope holder was created and produced in collaboration with the medical technology department at the Karolinska University Hospital.
RESULTS
Among 452 surgical procedures in 382 individuals, external laryngeal pressure was needed in 34% of the cases to receive adequate exposure of the larynx. External pressure was more frequently needed among male patients (P = 0.007). Neither the location of the lesion on the vocal fold nor whether it was malignant or benign was significantly important (P = 0.798 and P = 0.073, respectively). A new laryngoscope holder is presented, which can provide stable external pressure on the laryngeal framework during MLS.
CONCLUSION
External laryngeal pressure was needed in 34% of the cases for full laryngeal exposure during MLS. To facilitate external pressure of the larynx during surgery, we present an innovative, adjustable laryngoscope holder that can be used in the laryngoscopy setting for improved visualization of the vocal folds. The device will be further investigated in prospective studies.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.