World journal of methodology · 2026
Strengthening trauma care in low- and middle-income countries through guideline adaptation and scalable system reforms.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Le Kim-Long, Pham Tri-Nhan, Tran Minh-Quang, Trinh My-Tran, Pham Phu-Cuong, Duong-Ngoc Quynh-Nhu, Thai Khanh-Phat, Le Nguyen-Khoi, Mai-Phan Tuong-Anh, Luong-Toan Hoang-Long
Аннотация
Trauma is a leading global cause of death and disability, with nearly 90% of fatalities occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where prehospital care, infrastructure, and trained personnel are limited. This narrative review synthesizes literature (2019-2025) on the initial management of adult polytrauma, and explores strategies to adapt global guidelines in resource-constrained settings. Contemporary frameworks such as advanced trauma life support (ATLS) and World Health Organization essential trauma care emphasize context-sensitive sequencing, permissive hypotension, balanced transfusion, damage-control surgery, and integration of point-of-care ultrasound. Adjuncts including tranexamic acid, viscoelastic-guided transfusion, prehospital whole blood, and selective aortic balloon occlusion offer incremental survival benefits. However, widespread barriers-training deficits, blood bank shortages, lack of imaging, and absent trauma registries-impede implementation. Emerging models demonstrate that scalable solutions such as primary trauma care courses, phased ATLS rollouts, hybrid emergency rooms, and tablet-based registries can reduce mortality and referral delays without requiring wholesale adoption of high-income systems. Meaningful progress requires adapting evidence-based guidelines to local realities, supported by investments in education, diagnostics, transfusion logistics, and national surveillance. Future work should quantify cost-effectiveness and refine context-specific frameworks to close the outcome gap in LMICs.