The use of absorbable adhesion barriers to reduce the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of an absorbable adhesion barrier (oxidized regenerated cellulose) for the prevention of peritoneal adhesions in women undergoing repeat cesarean delivery (CD).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single center study that included all women who underwent two consecutive CDs, 2011-2018. Women in whom an absorbable adhesion barrier (oxidized regenerated cellulose) was placed at the time of the initial CD (index CD) were compared to women in whom no such barrier was placed. The association between absorbable adhesion barrier placement at index CD and the presence of intraperitoneal adhesions at subsequent CD was assessed. Factors evaluated included intraperitoneal adhesion severity, time from skin incision to newborn delivery and total duration of surgery.

RESULTS

We identified 2125 women that met the inclusion criteria. They were divided into two groups; those in whom an absorbable adhesion barrier was placed at index CD and those in whom no such absorbable barrier was placed. 161 (7.6%) had an absorbable adhesion barrier placed at index CD. At the time of index CD, the rate of intra-peritoneal adhesions was 34.8% in the absorbable adhesion barrier group vs 26.5% in the group without the absorbable adhesion barrier (p = 0.02). At the time of subsequent CD, the rate of intraperitoneal adhesions was 39.8% in the absorbable adhesion barrier group vs 46% in the group without the absorbable adhesion barrier (p = 0.13). Notably, the use of an absorbable adhesion barrier lowered the mean increase in adhesions rate 0.05 ± 0.55 vs 0.20 ± 0.55 (p < 0.01). Absorbable adhesion barrier placement at index CD was found to be independently associated with a lower rate of intraperitoneal adhesions at subsequent CD, aOR 0.67 (0.47-0.96). Overall, absorbable adhesion barrier placement at index CD was associated with a shorter mean duration of subsequent surgery (min), 37.7 ± 18.9 vs. 42.7 ± 27.1 (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Absorbable adhesion barrier placement is associated with reduction in intraperitoneal adhesions and duration of surgery in subsequent CD.