Optimization of Subglottic View During Flexible Laryngoscopy With Patient Positioning.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Determine the ideal head position to optimize visualization of the subglottis using flexible laryngoscopy.
STUDY
DESIGN
Prospective cohort study.
SETTING
Outpatient multidisciplinary airway clinic at a tertiary care center.
METHODS
Patients presenting to a multidisciplinary airway clinic undergoing nasoendoscopic airway examination were enrolled. Three head positions were utilized to examine the subglottis during laryngoscopy: "sniffing," chin tuck, and stooping positions. In-office reviewers and blinded clinician participants evaluated views of the airway based on Cormack-Lehane (CL) scale, airway grade (AG), and visual analog scale (VAS). Demographic data were obtained. Statistical analysis compared head positions and demographic data using Student's t test, analysis of variance, and Tukey's post hoc analysis.
RESULTS
One hundred patients participated. No statistical differences existed among in-clinic or blinded reviewers for the CL score in any head position (p = .35, .5, respectively). For both AG and VAS, flexed and stooping positions were rated higher than the sniffing positions by both in-clinic and blinded reviewers (p < .01 for all analyses), but there was no statistical difference between these two positions (p = .28, .18, respectively). There was an inverse correlation between age and scores for AG and VAS in the flexed position for both sets of reviewers (p = .02, <.01 respectively), and a higher body mass index was significantly associated with the need to perform tracheoscopy for full airway evaluation (p < .01).
CONCLUSION
Both flexion and stoop postures can be implemented by an experienced endoscopist in awake, transnasal flexible laryngoscopy to enhance visualization of the subglottic airway.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.