m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026

Large increases in resistance training volume do not impair muscle hypertrophy or anabolic-catabolic molecular signaling in trained individuals.

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Camargo Júlio B B, Bittencourt Diego, Michel J Max, Silva Deivid G, Bergamasco João G A, Berry Alexander C, Tiede Dakota R, Lewis Dustyn, Nacafucasaco Enya T A, Ferrari Otávio, Melo Ana C C, Iasulaitis Matheus, Rebelatto Marcelo, Roberts Michael D, Libardi Cleiton A

Аннотация

Skeletal muscle hypertrophy results from the integrated regulation of anabolic and proteolytic processes in response to mechanical loading. Although increases in resistance training (RT) volume are used to increase mechanical stress, it remains uncertain whether large and abrupt volume progressions could exceed muscle adaptive capacity by disrupting the balance between anabolic and catabolic signaling. The present study investigated whether a large increase in weekly RT volume (+120%) leads to impaired hypertrophic outcomes and intracellular regulatory responses compared with a modest increase (+20%). Twenty-five resistance-trained men and women (18-35 yr old) completed an 8-wk randomized, single-blind, within-subject unilateral intervention. Each participant trained both legs twice weekly, with one leg assigned to the large (VOL120) and the contralateral leg to the modest (VOL20) weekly volume progressions relative to habitual training volume. Vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) was assessed by ultrasonography before and after training. Muscle biopsies were obtained at baseline, postintervention, and 24 h after the last session to quantify muscle fiber cross-sectional area (fCSA), satellite cell myonuclear content, and anabolic/catabolic signaling markers. Both protocols induced increases in mCSA over time (P < 0.001), with no protocol vs. time interaction. No significant effects were observed for fCSA nor satellite cell number or myonuclear content. In addition, molecular responses related to translational regulation and protein degradation were largely similar between protocols. A large abrupt increase in weekly resistance training volume (+120%) did not attenuate muscle hypertrophy relative to a modest increase (+20%) in resistance-trained individuals, and most acute and chronic molecular markers assessed likewise did not differ significantly between protocols.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A large, abrupt increase in weekly resistance training volume (+120% relative to habitual training) did not enhance muscle hypertrophy compared with a modest increase (+20%) in resistance-trained individuals. We found no evidence that the larger volume progression attenuated adaptation under the present experimental conditions. Acute and chronic molecular responses likewise did not differ significantly between protocols.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты