Using MR imaging to predict invasion of the recurrent laryngeal nerve by thyroid carcinoma.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
We evaluated the accuracy of MR imaging findings for predicting invasion of the recurrent laryngeal nerve by thyroid carcinoma and established an optimal criterion on which to base this prediction.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
We reviewed MR imaging findings (lesion size and posterior extension of tumor; encirclement of and invasion into the laryngeal cartilage, trachea, and esophagus by the tumor; and the amount of effaced fatty tissue in the tracheoesophageal groove or between the laryngeal cartilage and hypopharyngeal wall) in 66 patients with thyroid carcinoma. The amount of effaced fatty tissue was classified as one of five grades: 1, normal amount of fatty tissue; 2, partly effaced; 3, completely effaced in one MR imaging slice; 4, completely effaced in two contiguous MR slices; and 5, completely effaced in three or more contiguous MR slices.
RESULTS
Thirty-two (48%) of the 66 patients had surgically or pathologically verified recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion. Logistic modeling revealed that the amount of effaced fatty tissue (p < 0.001) and the lesion size (p = 0.033) were the significant factors. Using the threshold values for the lesion size to predict invasion, we found that a threshold of more than 2.9 cm showed the highest accuracy, 76%, with 78% sensitivity and 74% specificity. For the amount of effaced fatty tissue, a grade of 3 or more had the highest accuracy, 88%, with 94% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Addition of the lesion size to this criterion did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of using the amount of effaced fatty tissue alone.
CONCLUSION
Invasion of the recurrent laryngeal nerve by thyroid carcinoma was accurately predicted by the finding of effaced fatty tissue on MR imaging.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.