MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jce.16661

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025

Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of High-Frequency Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation Plus Rapid-Atrial Pacing in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Zei Paul C, Hincapie Daniela, Rodriguez-Taveras Joan, Osorio Jose, Alviz Isabella, Miranda-Arboleda Andres F, Gabr Mohamed, Thorne Christopher, Silverstein Joshua R, Thosani Amit J, Varley Allyson L, Moreno Fernando, Zapata Daniel A, D'Souza Benjamin, Rajendra Anil, Oza Saumil, Linda Justice R N, Baranowski Ana, Phan Huy, Velasco Alejandro, Te Charles C, Sackett Matthew C, Singleton Matthew J, Magnano Anthony R, Singh David, Kuk Richard, Steiger Nathaniel A, Sauer William H, Romero Jorge E

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

High-frequency low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation is a safe and cost-effective strategy that improves catheter stability, first-pass pulmonary vein isolation, and freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the incremental value of adding rapid-atrial pacing (RAP) to HFLTV-ventilation has not yet been determined.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of HFLTV-ventilation plus RAP during RFCA of paroxysmal AF on procedural and long-term clinical outcomes compared to HFLTV-ventilation alone.

METHODS

Patients from the REAL-AF prospective multicenter registry, who underwent RFCA of paroxysmal AF using either HFLTV + RAP (500-600 msec) or HFLTV ventilation alone from April 2020 to February 2023 were included. The primary outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, long-term clinical outcomes, and procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

A total of 545 patients were included in the analysis (HFLTV + RAP = 327 vs. HFLTV = 218). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. No differences were observed in procedural (HFLTV + RAP 74 [57-98] vs. HFLTV 66 [53-85.75] min, p = 0.617) and RF (HFLTV + RAP 15.15 [11.22-21.22] vs. HFLTV 13.99 [11.04-17.13] min, p = 0.620) times. Both groups showed a similar freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12-month follow-up (HFLTV + RAP 82.68% vs. HFLTV 86.52%, HR = 1.43, 95% CI [0.94-2.16], p = 0.093). There were no significant differences in freedom from AF-related symptoms (HFLTV + RAP 91.4% vs. HFLTV 93.1%, p = 0.476) or AF-related hospitalizations (HFLTV + RAP 98.5% vs. HFLTV 97.2%, p = 0.320). Procedure-related complications were low in both groups (HFLTV + RAP 0.6% vs. HFLTV 0%, p = 0.247).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing RFCA for paroxysmal AF, adding RAP to HFLTV-ventilation was not associated with improved procedural and long-term clinical outcomes.

Для цитирования: Zei Paul C, Hincapie Daniela, Rodriguez-Taveras Joan, Osorio Jose, Alviz Isabella, Miranda-Arboleda Andres F, Gabr Mohamed, Thorne Christopher, Silverstein Joshua R, Thosani Amit J, Varley Allyson L, Moreno Fernando, Zapata Daniel A, D'Souza Benjamin, Rajendra Anil, Oza Saumil, Linda Justice R N, Baranowski Ana, Phan Huy, Velasco Alejandro, Te Charles C, Sackett Matthew C, Singleton Matthew J, Magnano Anthony R, Singh David, Kuk Richard, Steiger Nathaniel A, Sauer William H, Romero Jorge E. Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of High-Frequency Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation Plus Rapid-Atrial Pacing in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/jce.16661.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.