The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2019
Robotic single-site myomectomy: A hybrid technique reducing operative time and blood loss.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Won Seyeon, Lee Nara, Kim Miseon, Kim Mi Kyoung, Kim Mi-La, Jung Yong Wook, Yun Bo Seong, Seong Seok Ju
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To introduce a hybrid robotic single-site myomectomy (H-RSSM) technique that includes laparoscopic single-site myoma excision followed by robotic single-site suture and compare its surgical outcomes with those of conventional robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM) using the da Vinci Si surgical system.
METHODS: Medical records of 89 consecutive women who underwent H-RSSM and 131 consecutive women who underwent RSSM were retrospectively reviewed. Patients characteristics and surgical outcomes were evaluated and compared between two groups.
RESULTS: The H-RSSM group had a significantly reduced operation time (98.7 ± 31.7 vs 141.4 ± 54.4 min, P < .001) and lower estimated blood loss (131.5 ± 78.1 vs 212.3 ± 189.8 mL, P < .001). Peritoneal adhesions were reported significantly more in the H-RSSM group than in the RSSM group (27.0% vs 9.2%, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: H-RSSM was found to be associated with reduced operative time and lower estimated blood loss. However, further prospective studies are needed to clarify these advantages.
METHODS: Medical records of 89 consecutive women who underwent H-RSSM and 131 consecutive women who underwent RSSM were retrospectively reviewed. Patients characteristics and surgical outcomes were evaluated and compared between two groups.
RESULTS: The H-RSSM group had a significantly reduced operation time (98.7 ± 31.7 vs 141.4 ± 54.4 min, P < .001) and lower estimated blood loss (131.5 ± 78.1 vs 212.3 ± 189.8 mL, P < .001). Peritoneal adhesions were reported significantly more in the H-RSSM group than in the RSSM group (27.0% vs 9.2%, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: H-RSSM was found to be associated with reduced operative time and lower estimated blood loss. However, further prospective studies are needed to clarify these advantages.