MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology · 2012

Hand contact dermatitis in hairdressers: clinical and causative allergens, experience in Bangkok.

Tresukosol Poohglin, Swasdivanich Chanutta

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Hand dermatitis in hairdressers is a common occupational contact dermatitis. Irritant contact dermatitis is thought to be more common.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the causes of hand dermatitis, common allergens, clinical patterns, morphology and onset of lesions among hairdressers.

METHODS

Forty four hairdressers who were diagnosed with hand dermatitis in a dermatological outpatient department were included and investigated by patch testing with standard and hairdressing related allergens and/or prick test.

RESULTS

Allergic contact dermatitis was diagnosed with a positive patch test reaction in 33 cases (75%), irritant contact dermatitis was found in 11 cases (25%). The clinical manifestations were mostly scaly plaques (68.18%) or vesicles (50%). The most common site of involvement was the palms (38.63%). The common causative allergens were paraphenylenediamine (45.45%), nickel (31.18%), fragrance mix (20.45%), p-toluenediamine sulphate (18.18%), ammonium persulfate (13.63%), and p-aminophenol (13.63%).

CONCLUSION

Allergic contact dermatitis is more common among hairdressers, PPD was the most common causative allergen in our study.

Для цитирования: Tresukosol Poohglin, Swasdivanich Chanutta. Hand contact dermatitis in hairdressers: clinical and causative allergens, experience in Bangkok.. Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology. 2012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.