DOI 10.1016/j.medj.2025.100668
Clinician-artificial intelligence collaboration: A win-win solution for efficiency and reliability in atrial fibrillation diagnosis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Given the biases and ethical concerns of AI models, the fully automatic diagnosis of diseases in clinical settings is challenging. In contrast, clinician-AI collaboration is considered essential to ensure the validity and reliability of utilizing AI models in clinical practice. However, effective strategies for clinician-AI collaboration remain largely unexplored.
METHODS
This study proposed a three-step general clinician-AI collaboration pipeline aimed at improving disease diagnosis efficiency: first, utilizing large real-world clinical datasets to evaluate and clarify clinicians' diagnostic strengths/weaknesses; second, developing an AI model to complement clinicians' weakness in disease diagnosis; and finally, proposing a clinician-AI collaboration strategy to leverage the strengths of both AI and clinicians. The effectiveness of this pipeline was validated through a study focusing on clinical paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) detection, utilizing 24-h Holter recordings from over 30,000 patients.
FINDINGS: In PAF detection, clinicians alone required a significant amount of time to identify the data and still overlooked 13.7% of PAF patients but successfully identified all non-atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Conversely, AI alone rarely missed PAF patients but misidentified 23.3% of non-AF patients as having PAF. After implementing the proposed clinician-AI collaboration strategy, all patients were correctly identified, and clinicians' workload was reduced by 76.7%.
CONCLUSIONS
This study improves both the efficiency and reliability of PAF detection, bridging the gap between AI model development and its clinical application, thereby effectively promoting the application of AI models in clinical AF screening.
FUNDING: This study was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.