Endoscopic papillectomy for laterally spreading lesions of the papilla: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic papillectomy is a standard treatment for ampullary lesions, which are typically small and confined to the papillary mound. Laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) of the papilla of Vater are a rare ampullary lesion subtype involving extensive duodenal mucosa. Data on endoscopic papillectomy outcomes for LSLs are limited. This study compared endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary LSLs and non-LSLs in matched cohorts.
METHODS
The ESAP study (Endoscopic papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary neoplasm) encompassed 1422 endoscopic papillectomies. Propensity score matching used the nearest-neighbor method for age, sex, co-morbidity, and histologic subtype as cofactors. The main outcomes were complete resection (R0), technical success, complications, and recurrences.
RESULTS
Propensity score-based matching identified 232 patients with ampullary lesions (116 non-LSL, 116 LSL) with comparable baseline characteristics. After first intervention, the R0 resection rate, the primary outcome measure, was significantly lower in the LSL group (54.3% [95%CI 45.3%–63.1%]) vs. 69.0% [95%CI 60.4%–76.6%]). Following repeated endoscopic interventions, technical success was similar in both groups (82.8%). After a 22-month median follow-up, the LSL group had significantly more recurrences (41.3% vs. 15.0%) and lower 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates (61.1% and 44.0% vs. 86.1% and 81.6%, respectively). Complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (LSL 32.8% vs. non-LSL 26.7%).
CONCLUSION
LSLs can be safely resected by endoscopic papillectomy, although repeated interventions are necessary to achieve complete resection. The higher risk of recurrence in LSLs necessitates a vigilant surveillance strategy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.