Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025
Reduced Muscle Loss in Patients With NSCLC Taking Fibrates: Findings From a Retrospective Observational Study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Elahjji Rahmi, Blow Tahj, Grover Rahul, Hurd Maurice A, Dunne Richard F, Caan Bette J, Cespedes Feliciano Elizabeth M, Plodkowski Andrew J, Flory James H, Goncalves Marcus D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The cancer-anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a common and debilitating wasting disorder characterized by loss of skeletal muscle and worse morbidity and mortality. In pre-clinical studies, CACS is associated with loss of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) dependent ketone production in the liver. Fibrates are PPAR-α agonists that are commonly used to treat dyslipidemia. Treating mice with fibrates was found to prevent skeletal muscle loss. We examine whether patients with cancer treated with PPAR-α agonists experience less CACS.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients (N = 6922) at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2002 and 2017 and were incidentally prescribed fenofibrate or gemfibrozil at the time of diagnosis. These patients were compared to a propensity score-matched control set who were not taking either drug. The primary outcome included a composite outcome of CACS, which included significant weight loss before or after the time of diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included change in cross-sectional skeletal muscle area over time as measured in serial CT imaging studies and overall survival. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to compare outcomes between the two groups.
RESULTS: Among patients with NSCLC, 149 were taking fenofibrate or gemfibrozil at the time of diagnosis. A 2:1 propensity score-matched cohort of 298 patients was created that was well-matched with regard to baseline characteristics. Regarding the primary composite outcome, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of CACS between those taking fibrates and propensity-matched controls (49.7 vs. 46.6%). When skeletal muscle mass was measured directly using cross-sectional imaging, patients on fibrates were found to have lost significantly less muscle area over time (-3.3 vs.-4.2%, p = 0.03). There was no difference in overall survival between groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients with NSCLC taking fibrates at the time of diagnosis lost less muscle area over time. In a secondary analysis, this change was not associated with a change in overall survival, though this study was likely underpowered for this analysis.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients (N = 6922) at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2002 and 2017 and were incidentally prescribed fenofibrate or gemfibrozil at the time of diagnosis. These patients were compared to a propensity score-matched control set who were not taking either drug. The primary outcome included a composite outcome of CACS, which included significant weight loss before or after the time of diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included change in cross-sectional skeletal muscle area over time as measured in serial CT imaging studies and overall survival. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to compare outcomes between the two groups.
RESULTS: Among patients with NSCLC, 149 were taking fenofibrate or gemfibrozil at the time of diagnosis. A 2:1 propensity score-matched cohort of 298 patients was created that was well-matched with regard to baseline characteristics. Regarding the primary composite outcome, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of CACS between those taking fibrates and propensity-matched controls (49.7 vs. 46.6%). When skeletal muscle mass was measured directly using cross-sectional imaging, patients on fibrates were found to have lost significantly less muscle area over time (-3.3 vs.-4.2%, p = 0.03). There was no difference in overall survival between groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients with NSCLC taking fibrates at the time of diagnosis lost less muscle area over time. In a secondary analysis, this change was not associated with a change in overall survival, though this study was likely underpowered for this analysis.