Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery in the Treatment of Renal Hydatid Cysts.

Background

To compare the efficacy, safety, and long-term results of laparoscopic and open approaches in patients undergoing surgery for renal hydatid cyst. Materials and

Methods

The files of 36 patients who were surgically treated in our clinic and with diagnosis of renal cyst hydatid confirmed pathologically were reviewed. According to the surgical technique applied, the patients were divided into two groups as open (group 1) or laparoscopic (group 2) partial pericystectomy. Oral albendazole was given 10 mg/kg/day (in two divided doses) for 4 weeks preoperatively and for three cycles of 4 weeks at 1-week intervals after surgery in all patients. Demographic characteristics, laboratory and imaging findings, operation times, hospitalization times, complications, intraoperative bleeding amounts, and recurrence rates were statistically compared in both groups.

Results

Open partial pericystectomy was performed in 21 patients in group 1, and laparoscopic transperitoneal partial pericystectomy was performed in 15 patients in group 2. Operation time and intraoperative bleeding amount in group 1 and group 2 were 119.6 ± 17.1/116.1 ± 17.6 minutes and 125.7 ± 27.8/113.9 ± 19.2 mL, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between these values (P = .557, P = .167, respectively). Hospitalization duration of both groups was 5.9 ± 1.4/3.6 ± 0.7 days, respectively. Hospitalization duration in group 2 was statistically significantly shorter (P < .001). No recurrence occurred during postoperative follow-up in either group.

Conclusions

In the treatment of renal hydatid cysts, laparoscopy, which is a minimally invasive approach, can be technically applied with the same principles as open surgery and has a similar efficacy and safety profile for short- and long-term results.