BMC oral health · 2026
Survival of single-tooth implants in sites with and without history of external cervical root resorption: a register-based cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mota de Almeida Fernando José, Norberg Cedering Jonas, Pettersson Mattias
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the survival of single-tooth implants placed in sites with previous external cervical root resorption (ECRR) to those placed in unaffected sites.
METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using data from the Swedish National Dental Health Register (2009-2022). Patients receiving a single-tooth implant in a site with previous ECRR were identified and matched 1:1 to controls without such history by age, sex, tooth position, and timing of implant placement (± 2 years). Implant survival, defined as time from placement to removal, was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and stratified Cox proportional hazards models. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was estimated up to 10 years. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses assessed robustness.
RESULTS: The final cohort included 605 matched pairs (n = 1,210). The mean age was 52 years, and 56% of implants were placed in the maxillary anterior region. Implant extraction occurred in 12/571 (2.1%) sites with previous ECRR and 21/564 (3.7%) control sites. Ten-year cumulative survival was 97.3% for sites with previous ECRR and 94.4% for controls. The difference was not statistically significant (HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.28-1.22; p = 0.15). RMST analysis showed a negligible absolute survival difference (0.11 years; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.25; p = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of registry-based data and a low number of failures, no statistically significant difference in implant survival was detected between sites with and without previous ECRR. These findings suggest comparable survival outcomes but should be interpreted with caution.
METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted using data from the Swedish National Dental Health Register (2009-2022). Patients receiving a single-tooth implant in a site with previous ECRR were identified and matched 1:1 to controls without such history by age, sex, tooth position, and timing of implant placement (± 2 years). Implant survival, defined as time from placement to removal, was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and stratified Cox proportional hazards models. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was estimated up to 10 years. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses assessed robustness.
RESULTS: The final cohort included 605 matched pairs (n = 1,210). The mean age was 52 years, and 56% of implants were placed in the maxillary anterior region. Implant extraction occurred in 12/571 (2.1%) sites with previous ECRR and 21/564 (3.7%) control sites. Ten-year cumulative survival was 97.3% for sites with previous ECRR and 94.4% for controls. The difference was not statistically significant (HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.28-1.22; p = 0.15). RMST analysis showed a negligible absolute survival difference (0.11 years; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.25; p = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of registry-based data and a low number of failures, no statistically significant difference in implant survival was detected between sites with and without previous ECRR. These findings suggest comparable survival outcomes but should be interpreted with caution.