DOI 10.1038/s41393-026-01237-7
Effect of intradural decompression on neurological recovery in acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
STUDY
DESIGN
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effect of intradural decompression (durotomy with or without duroplasty) on neurological recovery and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-related complications following acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating intradural decompression in traumatic SCI were included, and outcomes were pooled using random-effects models.
RESULTS
Eight observational studies were included. Intradural decompression was associated with improved motor recovery (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.62-1.02; p < 0.00001), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 59%). The pooled neurological improvement rate was approximately 82%, although substantial heterogeneity was present (I² = 77%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant effect in incomplete or mixed SCI populations (SMD 1.40, 95% CI 0.05-2.75), whereas the effect in complete injuries was not statistically significant (SMD 1.21, 95% CI - 0.36-2.78). No significant increase in CSF-related complications was observed (OR 2.29, 95% CI 0.79-6.63; I² = 0%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the overall findings despite evidence of small-study effects.
CONCLUSIONS
Intradural decompression may improve neurological recovery following acute SCI, particularly in patients with incomplete injuries. However, the current evidence is limited to observational studies with substantial heterogeneity and risk of bias. High-quality prospective comparative studies and randomized trials are required before routine adoption can be recommended.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.