DOI 10.1016/j.echo.2023.10.012
The Pixel Variation Score: An Echocardiographic Index to Assess Temporal Variation of Mitral Regurgitant Flow.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
In mitral regurgitation (MR), temporal variation of MR flow has been considered an important reason for inaccurate MR grading. Current echocardiographic methods for assessing temporal MR flow variation are complex, and their clinical relevance has not been investigated. In this study, we investigated whether assessing MR flow variation using a dimensionless index with echocardiography is feasible, clinically meaningful, and related to patient outcomes.
METHODS
Consecutive patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP, n = 244) and functional MR (FMR, n = 396) underwent comprehensive echocardiography. Mitral regurgitation severity was assessed using an integrated approach advocated by current guidelines. The MR continuous-wave Doppler envelope was divided into 3 segments of equal duration. Each segment's pixel intensity was assessed to calculate the pixel variation score (PVS).
RESULTS
The PVS was lower in FMR patients than in MVP patients. Lower PVS was associated with worse MR, larger left atrial and left ventricular dimensions, lower ejection fraction, and higher pulmonary artery pressures. In MVP, PVS was significantly associated with postoperative left ventricular reverse remodeling and was able to reclassify most patients in whom single-frame measures overestimated MR severity. Finally, PVS had incremental prognostic value on top of clinical and echocardiographic predictors of outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Temporal variation in MR flow can reliably be assessed with echocardiography through analysis of the continuous-wave Doppler signal. A high PVS value may alert the echocardiographer to defer from single-frame MR grading and also suggests that the MR is probably not severe.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.