Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Managing Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) in USA: Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) vs Standard of Care (SoC).

PURPOSE: Chronic skin ulcers in diabetic foot patients are a significant health concern. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) significantly threaten the health and longevity of individuals with diabetes, leading to severe complications like infection and amputation and contributing to high morbidity and mortality rates. Given the severe implications, practical strategies to prevent and manage DFUs are crucial to reducing amputation rates. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a popular treatment option due to its properties that mimic the body's natural healing process. The objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PRPR vs standard of care in US context.

METHODS

Decision analytical model was used to synthesize clinical and economic parameters. In detail a CEA analysis was employed using a Markov decision-making model to evaluate patients with chronic DFUs lasting over three weeks and at high risk for orthopedic complications. The study assessed the effectiveness of different treatments, measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and reported costs in 2023 dollars using a micro-costing approach alongside a clinical trial.

RESULTS

The study concluded that PRP gel is a cost-effective treatment for non-healing DFUs, resulting in lower care costs over one year compared to other treatments and cost savings over five years.

CONCLUSION

Thus, PRP treatment is a promising and practical option, improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. It is an attractive choice for healthcare providers and insurers in managing non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.