DOI 10.3390/diagnostics16030391
Abnormal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Patterns in Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders Due to Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis: A Comparative Study.
Аннотация
Background
Brain MRI abnormalities in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis (ANMDARE) are classically described in limbic structures, particularly the medial temporal lobe. Paralimbic, neocortical, and meningeal abnormalities have been less consistently reported.
Objective
The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of brain MRI abnormalities in patients with definite ANMDARE.
Methods
We conducted a case-control study including 115 patients with ANMDARE and 115 controls with primary psychotic disorders or antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis. Structural MRI studies were systematically reviewed by an expert neuroradiologist blinded to clinical diagnosis.
Results
ANMDARE patients were younger and more frequently presented with seizures, dyskinesia, severe neuropsychiatric disturbances, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid and EEG findings, and worse outcomes, including mortality. T2-T2-FLAIR abnormalities commonly involved medial temporal limbic structures, paralimbic regions (anterior cingulate and insular cortices), and neocortical areas (parieto-occipital cortices). Pachymeningeal enhancement was observed in 26.1% of patients. MRI findings clearly differentiated ANMDARE from primary psychotic disorders but largely overlapped with antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis, except for limited parietal and occipital differences.
Conclusions
T2-FLAIR MRI abnormalities involving medial temporal, paralimbic, and posterior neocortical regions are common in ANMDARE. Pachymeningeal enhancement is not rare. While useful for distinguishing ANMDARE from primary psychotic disorders, a substantial overlap with antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis was observed.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.